"Hersh...pointing out the Covert operations would likely leave a trail searchable by the public." When listening to you, you put in the word, "not" as in "not likely to leave a trail," which I think is correct. If so, you may wish to correct the transcript.
As for whodunit, the US, of course. The day it happened I knew who did it and anyone who didn't know it was the US (no matter what they said or say now) probably has rocks for brains. Besides, man, if Sy Hersh says the US did it, it's true. I know that much about the man. He can always prove what he writes. The guy has accumulated a wealth of resources, the best in the world, and they trust him.
"A distinction without a difference." What a perfect use of the phrase. A thousand thanks for this, and for all your investigative journalism. I happened to hear you on George Galloway’s podcast, which led me to your substack.
One thing you mentioned only briefly in your interview with Galloway was the past UN Security Council hearing on Russia’s effort to have the Council investigate Nord Stream. The listener might have gotten the mistaken impression that the effort went nowhere and was met with little enthusiasm. True, the resolution did not pass, but if you consider the countries on the Council by population, the resolution was overwhelmingly supported, with populous China, Brazil and Russia all voting for it. I’ve analyzed the hearing and the vote in detail in my article:
Hey @brycegreene I heard you on MintPress talking about Nord Stream. I didn't hear you mention whistleblower John Mark Dougan though. I encourage you to look into this specifically:
One of your comments made me think you might have seen that already, I just wanted to be sure. :) I didn't mean to post this as a criticism of you -- you did an excellent job -- I just wanted to double-check that you saw this story because clearly you had seen all the other material. I don't share your politics, though I do share your passion for truth -- keep up the great work!
"Hersh...pointing out the Covert operations would likely leave a trail searchable by the public." When listening to you, you put in the word, "not" as in "not likely to leave a trail," which I think is correct. If so, you may wish to correct the transcript.
As for whodunit, the US, of course. The day it happened I knew who did it and anyone who didn't know it was the US (no matter what they said or say now) probably has rocks for brains. Besides, man, if Sy Hersh says the US did it, it's true. I know that much about the man. He can always prove what he writes. The guy has accumulated a wealth of resources, the best in the world, and they trust him.
"A distinction without a difference." What a perfect use of the phrase. A thousand thanks for this, and for all your investigative journalism. I happened to hear you on George Galloway’s podcast, which led me to your substack.
One thing you mentioned only briefly in your interview with Galloway was the past UN Security Council hearing on Russia’s effort to have the Council investigate Nord Stream. The listener might have gotten the mistaken impression that the effort went nowhere and was met with little enthusiasm. True, the resolution did not pass, but if you consider the countries on the Council by population, the resolution was overwhelmingly supported, with populous China, Brazil and Russia all voting for it. I’ve analyzed the hearing and the vote in detail in my article:
https://libya360.wordpress.com/2023/04/10/72-of-the-un-security-council-backed-russias-call-for-the-un-to-investigate-the-nord-stream-bombing/
Thank you for this!
Found you on George Galloway MOATS. Thanks for your input, terrific piece! Keep up the great work thank you 👍
Hey @brycegreene I heard you on MintPress talking about Nord Stream. I didn't hear you mention whistleblower John Mark Dougan though. I encourage you to look into this specifically:
https://epistemologist.substack.com/p/john-mark-dougan-i-received-a-whistleblower
More generally I recommend this:
https://epistemologist.substack.com/p/nord-stream-pipeline-sabotage-documented
Time did not permit me to go deep into the corroboration for Hersh's story, though this is an important part of the story!
One of your comments made me think you might have seen that already, I just wanted to be sure. :) I didn't mean to post this as a criticism of you -- you did an excellent job -- I just wanted to double-check that you saw this story because clearly you had seen all the other material. I don't share your politics, though I do share your passion for truth -- keep up the great work!